Author: Sergey Veselovsky

  • Persona Architecture: The People Behind Prepaid Card Demand

    Persona Architecture: The People Behind Prepaid Card Demand

    Persona Architecture: Following the People Behind Prepaid Card Demand. Demand Architecture, Who Module. A dark territory grid with gold arrows converging on one glowing highlighted cell, representing consumer migration toward a single motivational territory.

    This article builds on the previous paper, Need Architecture, where we introduced Motivational Territories (Need Domain + Need Level) and used the Canadian prepaid card market to identify the motivations shaping demand.

    Introduction

    Demand exists because human needs exist. In the previous article, we introduced Need Architecture and identified the Motivational Territories shaping demand for prepaid cards.

    Now let’s focus on the people behind that demand. Needs create demand. People express it. Persona Architecture explains how different motivations combine within real people and how those motivations evolve over time. If Need Architecture maps the motivational landscape, Persona Architecture shows who occupies it today — and how that landscape changes as people move through it.

    The People Behind Demand

    Meet Alex.

    Alex first adopted a prepaid card because it made travel easier. At the time, his dominant Motivational Territory was Freedom @ Functional.

    Over time, however, his priorities changed. As he began shopping online more often, protecting his primary bank account became more important than simplifying travel. His dominant motivation shifted to a different Motivational Territory — Safety @ Emotional.

    Alex’s story illustrates an important point: people rarely organize their lives around a single motivation. They hold multiple aspirations, play multiple social roles, and pursue several goals simultaneously. As those motivations evolve, people gradually shift between Motivational Territories.

    This is where Persona Architecture adds a new dimension to demand analysis.

    Profiling the people who occupy different Motivational Territories provides a static view of demand — who customers are, how many occupy each territory, and what motivates them today.

    Tracking how people move between Motivational Territories provides a dynamic view of demand, revealing how markets evolve over time and where future opportunities are likely to emerge.

    Let’s revisit the Canadian prepaid card market — this time through the lens of Persona Architecture.

    The Proof of Concept

    Static View: Today’s Demand Landscape

    To illustrate Persona Architecture, we’ll continue using the same proof-of-concept study introduced in the previous article. The objective is not to size the Canadian prepaid card market, but to demonstrate how the first two Demand Architecture modules work together. Need Architecture explains what motivates demand. Persona Architecture explains the people behind that demand—and how they evolve over time.

    About the study:  The proof-of-concept study was fielded in May 2026 using a nationally representative Canadian sample of n = 500 consumers open to a prepaid card. Need Domains were measured using MaxDiff, while Need Levels were identified through AI-guided interviews conducted within the same study. The figures presented in this article are directional and are intended to demonstrate the methodology rather than estimate market size.

    Our previous article showed how demand is distributed across different Motivational Territories. Five Need Domains accounted for 92% of respondents, and none reached the Ecosystem level. The percentages below show the proportion of consumers whose dominant motivation falls within each Motivational Territory.

    Need DomainFunctionalTaskEmotionalIdentityEcosystem
    Safety4.9%1.1%21.1%0.0%0.0%
    Caregiving6.4%12.5%1.8%1.3%0.0%
    Control4.0%9.4%1.3%1.3%0.0%
    Freedom7.7%3.5%2.5%0.3%0.0%
    Self-expression2.0%3.0%3.8%4.3%0.0%
    Figure 1. Motivational Territories. Shaded cell = the dominant Need Level for each domain.

    Demand is concentrated in four dominant Motivational Territories:

    • Safety @ Emotional (21.1%) — reassurance and peace of mind rather than security as a feature.
    • Caregiving @ Task (12.5%) — making it easier to support and provide for others.
    • Control @ Task (9.4%) — managing spending with less effort.
    • Freedom @ Functional (7.7%) — practical travel convenience.

    Self-expression @ Identity is different. Although it represents a much smaller share of demand (4.3%), it is the only Need Domain that reaches the Identity level, making it strategically important despite its current size.

    Who Lives in These Territories

    Profiling each Motivational Territory by life stage, income, geography, and consumers’ own descriptions of the category turns the map into four recognizable types of people:

    • The Guardians (Safety @ Emotional): The everyday household. Middle-aged, married, mix of education levels, more likely than average to have children at home, and with the most modest incomes. They do more of their shopping online and are looking for peace of mind. Their concerns are about trust and reassurance, not product features.
    • The Providers (Caregiving @ Task): The established givers. Older suburban households that are married, comfortable, and routine-driven. Word of mouth matters more to them than to any other group. Providing for others is part of who they are, not just something they do.
    • The Pragmatists (Control @ Task): The affluent skeptics. The most distinctive group: highly educated, urban, and with the highest incomes. They see a prepaid card as a practical financial tool for a specific job — not as a product they build a relationship with.
    • The Navigators (Freedom @ Functional): The urban movers. The youngest group by almost every measure: highly urban, predominantly single, well educated, and with above-average incomes. They value prepaid cards for practical reasons — travel, foreign currencies, and avoiding surprises abroad — and engage with the category in a light, functional way.

    Self-expression @ Identity is different. It is an emerging Motivational Territory rather than a clearly defined persona. Only 4% of consumers currently occupy this territory, which is too few to profile reliably. However, nearly one in six consumers (18%) currently belong to another Motivational Territory, yet express interest in an identity-expressive prepaid card. Their motivations revolve around personal passions — gaming, hobbies, or other interests that are “their own little world.” This combination of a small current population and much larger latent demand is a hallmark of an emerging territory.

    Supply vs. Demand

    Supply: As the previous article showed, most Canadian prepaid cards compete in just three Motivational Territories — Control @ Task, Freedom @ Functional, and Caregiving @ Task. In other words, the market competes primarily on features, fees, and use cases.

    Demand: The largest untapped opportunities lie at the Emotional level and, to a lesser extent, the Identity level, where almost no brands are positioned.

    Viewed as a static map, the analysis reveals two attractive opportunities for a new prepaid card entrant (or an existing brand seeking a major repositioning). Both occupy need spaces that are largely underserved by the current market:

    • The Guardians (Safety @ Emotional) occupy the largest underserved Motivational Territory (21% of demand), yet very few brands have built their value proposition around this persona. Most emphasize security features such as encryption and fraud protection, but few position themselves around the emotional promise of “the card that lets you stop worrying online.”
    • The Emerging Persona (Self-expression @ Identity) represents a genuine white-space opportunity. The underlying need already exists, but no dedicated prepaid card currently addresses it directly. Even the Joker Mastercard has expanded beyond its original focus on gambling and gaming. Instead, consumers satisfy this need indirectly through generic prepaid cards used for privacy rather than self-expression.

    The static view tells us where demand exists today. The next question is whether those opportunities are growing, shrinking, or changing over time. To answer that, we need to add the dynamic view by examining how people move between Motivational Territories.

    Dynamic View: Where Demand Is Moving

    Markets evolve because people evolve.

    Need Architecture identified the Motivational Territories shaping demand, Persona Architecture identifies the people behind that demand — and how they evolve over time. Understanding that evolution often provides a better guide to future growth than understanding today’s market.

    Estimated migration between Motivational Territories in the Canadian prepaid card market. Arrow width shows the share of consumers moving; the strongest flow runs from Freedom at Functional (Navigators) into Safety at Emotional (Guardians), with a moderate drift from Caregiving at Task (Providers), diffuse exits from Control at Task (Pragmatists), and a thin emerging pull toward Self-expression at Identity.
    Figure 2. Estimated migration between Motivational Territories. Almost every major movement converges on Safety @ Emotional territory. Arrow width represents the estimated share of consumers making each transition over time.

    About the migration analysis:  Migration cannot be observed directly in a single research wave. Direction and timing were inferred from each respondent’s full motivational profile — how strongly their dominant motivation is established (“competing motivations” refers to consumers whose top two motivations are close in strength) and how attracted they are to alternative Motivational Territories. Figures are directional estimates pending a tracking wave.

    The migration analysis reveals that personas differ not only in what motivates them today, but also in how stable those motivations are over time. The Guardians and the Providers are the market’s most stable personas — once consumers adopt a prepaid card for these reasons, they tend to maintain those motivations. Some Providers, however, gradually evolve from providing for others to protecting them, incorporating Safety into their core motivation.

    The Navigators often adopt a prepaid card for its travel benefits, but many later shift toward reassurance and online safety. The Pragmatists are the least stable persona, typically adopting a prepaid card to solve a specific problem before moving on to other motivations.

    The Strategic Priorities

    Looking at the market through both a static and a dynamic lens transforms a map of demand into a roadmap for growth.

    • The static view identifies where unmet demand exists today.
    • The dynamic view reveals how personas evolve, where customers are moving, and which opportunities are likely to grow or decline over time.

    Together, they allow organizations to distinguish between primary growth opportunities, acquisition opportunities, emerging opportunities, and mature, highly contested markets.

    Primary Opportunity: The Guardians (Acquisition & Growth)

    The stable, underserved demand-generating persona occupying the market’s strongest growth territory.

    • Their dominant motivation accounts for 76% of their overall motivational profile, and only 12% show competing motivations, making them the most stable persona in the category.
    • Even more importantly, Safety @ Emotional is not only the largest Motivational Territory (21% of demand), but also the market’s strongest area of attraction. Consumers from almost every other persona show their strongest pull toward this territory, meaning more people are gradually moving toward this Motivational Territory than away from it.

    Strategic implication: Build a prepaid card around emotional reassurance rather than simply security features. Design the value proposition primarily for the Guardians while ensuring it also resonates with other personas gradually moving toward this Motivational Territory.

    Secondary Opportunity: The Navigators (Acquisition & Retention)

    The easiest point of market entry with strong long-term growth potential.

    • The Navigators are typically younger, highly mobile consumers, adopting prepaid cards for Freedom @ Functional — travel convenience, multiple currencies, and practical utility.
    • The migration analysis shows that this persona gradually shifting toward the Safety @ Emotional territory within 12–18 months, as reassurance and online safety become more important than travel convenience.

    Strategic implication: Continue using travel convenience as the primary acquisition value proposition, but gradually introduce a safety-focused positioning to strengthen long-term engagement and retention.

    Future Opportunity to Monitor: The Emerging Persona — Self-Expression @ Identity

    A genuine white-space opportunity with meaningful latent demand.

    Although only 4% of consumers currently occupy this Motivational Territory, nearly 18% already show interest in an identity-expressive prepaid card while currently belonging to another persona.

    Strategic implication: Monitor rather than invest. Track how the territory evolves, but wait until the market reaches sufficient scale before launching a dedicated product.

    Lower-Priority Personas

    The current market structure suggests that The Providers and The Pragmatists are less attractive targets for new prepaid card entrants. Existing Canadian prepaid cards already compete heavily for these personas. These are also the territories that customers are most likely to leave, making them mature, highly contested markets with limited opportunities for differentiation and long-term growth.

    The Providers are a mature and stable persona. Only 16% show competing motivations, and their dominant motivation is unlikely to change within the next year. When it does, it typically shifts toward the Guardian mindset, as the desire to provide gradually evolves into the desire to protect.

    Avoid competing directly in the mature gifting space.

    The Pragmatists are the least stable persona in the category. Their dominant motivation accounts for only 56% of their overall motivational profile, while 44% show competing motivations — the highest proportion of any persona. They typically adopt prepaid cards to solve a specific budgeting or money-management problem before moving toward other motivations.

    Avoid building a long-term positioning around this group. Products focused primarily on budgeting and money management may acquire customers but often struggle to retain them.

    What This Proof of Concept Demonstrates

    The static view identified two underserved opportunities: The Guardians and Self-expression. Adding the dynamic view not only strengthened the business case for both but also revealed a third opportunity—the Navigators—whose evolving motivations make them an ideal target for customer acquisition and long-term retention.

    Together, the static and dynamic views show that successful prepaid card strategies should be built not only around where demand exists today, but also around where customer motivations are heading.

    From Structure to Dynamics

    Need Architecture explains the structure of demand. Persona Architecture explains the dynamics of demand. Together they provide a foundation for designing products and value propositions that not only satisfy today’s customer needs but also remain relevant as those needs evolve over time.

    Markets evolve because people evolve. Persona Architecture helps us understand both.

    But understanding demand is only the beginning. The next question is how to design products that evolve with customers rather than simply satisfy today’s needs. That is the focus of the next Demand Architecture module: Product & Value Proposition Architecture.

  • Need Architecture: Finding Hidden Growth Opportunities in the Canadian Prepaid Card Market

    Need Architecture: Finding Hidden Growth Opportunities in the Canadian Prepaid Card Market

    Need Architecture: Finding Hidden Growth Opportunities in the Canadian Prepaid Card Market. Demand Architecture, Why Module. A dark territory grid with two glowing highlighted cells representing hidden opportunities.

    Why do prepaid cards in Canada all look the same?

    Most compete on budgeting, travel, or gifting — features, fees, and use cases. But people don’t choose products based only on features. They choose them because they satisfy underlying human motivations.

    We mapped those motivations across the Canadian prepaid card market and found something surprising: the single largest customer motivation — shared by one in five consumers — is barely addressed by today’s market.

    Why Existing Approaches Are Not Enough

    Companies invest heavily in understanding customer needs, yet translating those needs into clear product, pricing, and marketing decisions remains difficult.

    Existing approaches — including Jobs-to-be-Done, Means-End Chains, Self-Determination Theory, and identity-based motivation — each explain an important part of customer motivation. But most focus on either what customers are trying to achieve or how deeply that motivation matters. What is often missing is a practical way to combine both dimensions, measure them consistently, and use them to guide strategy.

    Need Architecture

    Need Architecture was developed to address this gap.

    It separates customer needs into two dimensions:

    • Need Domain: what the customer is ultimately seeking (such as safety, status, freedom)
    • Need Level: how deeply that motivation is experienced (such as functional, emotional, identity)

    The core idea:  Together, Need Domain and Need Level define a customer’s Motivational Territory — the need space a product or a brand can choose to occupy. Every downstream decision—from personas and product design to pricing and customer experience—flows from the Motivational Territory an organization chooses to occupy.

    Need Domains: What Customers Are Seeking

    Need Domains describe the underlying motivation shaping customer demand. Examples include:

    Need DomainWhat the customer is seeking
    Control“I want to feel in charge of what happens.”
    Freedom“I want fewer restrictions and more choices.”
    Safety“I want to feel protected from bad outcomes.”
    Status“I want others to recognize my success.”

    Most products do not operate within a single Need Domain. They typically have one Primary Domain—the dominant motivation that defines their core strategic territory—supported by one or more Secondary Domains that reinforce credibility, differentiation, or adoption.

    Need Levels: How Deeply the Need Is Experienced

    Customers may pursue the same Need Domain at very different levels. Levitt famously observed that people do not want a quarter-inch drill; they want a quarter-inch hole. The Need Architecture approach extends this logic further. The hole itself (the functional level of the need) may simply be a solution to a deeper need. The real need may be to hang a picture (task level), make a home feel warm and personal (emotional level), or be a good homeowner (identity level). The deeper the level, the less the product competes only on features and the more it competes on emotional outcomes, identity, and belonging.

    Need LevelExampleStrategic implicationDesign approach
    FunctionalA drillMost crowded, lowest margin. Compete on features and parity.Design for specifications and reliability.
    TaskHang a pictureCompete on task completion, UX, and reliability.Design for seamless flow and friction reduction.
    EmotionalMake home feel warmCompete on emotional outcome. Commands a premium.Design for the feeling the customer is seeking.
    IdentityBe a good homeownerMost defensible. Compete on self-concept.Design for identity reinforcement and signal.
    Belonging / EcosystemCreate a home others gather inRarest. Compete on belonging and participation.Design for community and shared meaning.

    The Need Architecture Matrix

    Need Domains and Need Levels work together to define a customer’s Motivational Territory. The example below illustrates Motivational Territories for a financial services category. Rows show what customers are trying to achieve (Need Domains); columns show how deeply that motivation is experienced (Need Levels). Each cell is a distinct territory with its own strategic implications, expressed as [Need Domain] @ [Need Level].

    Need DomainFunctionalTaskEmotionalIdentityBelonging / Ecosystem
    ControlTrack expensesManage money reliablyFeel financially stableBe a responsible adultBe the anchor others depend on
    FreedomAccess money anywhereSimplify financial lifeFeel unencumberedBe financially independentCreate freedom others admire
    SafetyProtect against fraudHave reliable backupFeel financially safeBe always preparedCreate safety for those around me
    StatusOwn premium productsMaintain high standingFeel financially aheadSignal financial successLead communities of achievers
    SimplicityAutomate paymentsReduce complexityReduce financial anxietyBe seen as effortlessCreate simplicity for others

    For example, a brand might choose to compete at Control @ Emotional. That single choice shapes every downstream decision. Its competitors are brands that help customers feel financially stable, not those focused on excitement or belonging. Its value proposition, pricing, and customer experience must all reinforce that emotional promise. The Motivational Territory a brand chooses ultimately determines how it competes.

    Why this matters:  Customers may share the same Need Domain but occupy very different Need Levels. Treating them as a single segment masks important differences in product expectations, pricing sensitivity, and customer experience.

    A customer-needs framework is only useful if it leads to better strategic decisions. The following proof of concept illustrates how Need Architecture can be used to identify underserved market opportunities.

    The Proof of Concept

    Prepaid Card Need Architecture

    The Need Architecture Matrix is category-independent. The following illustrative example applies the same methodology to identify Motivational Territories within a specific market: prepaid cards in Canada.

    About the study:  The proof of concept study was fielded in May 2026 with a nationally representative Canadian sample of n = 500 respondents who indicated they would be open to a prepaid card. Need Domains were measured with a MaxDiff exercise; Need Levels were coded from AI-guided interviews conducted within the same study. Figures are directional and intended to demonstrate the methodology rather than to size the market.

    Step 1 — Measure Need Domains Using MaxDiff

    Need Architecture is built around fourteen fundamental Need Domains representing broad human motivations (see Appendix). Because these domains are universal, they must be translated into category-specific expressions before they can be measured. All Need Domain statements were intentionally written at the functional Need Level to avoid introducing Need Level bias into the MaxDiff exercise. For example, the Safety domain was expressed as “Safety: I want to protect my primary bank or card when making purchases online,” and the Control domain as “Control: I want to manage my spending and stay within my budget.”

    The five leading Need Domains selected by respondents for a prepaid card were:

    Horizontal bar chart of MaxDiff preference share for the five leading Need Domains: Safety 27%, Caregiving 22%, Control 16%, Freedom 14%, Self-expression 13%.
    Figure 1. MaxDiff preference share across the five leading Need Domains (%).

    Step 2 — Code Need Levels from AI-Guided Interviews

    The dominant Need Level was identified by coding AI-guided interviews conducted after the MaxDiff exercise. The interviews focused on the Need Domains each respondent selected most often during the MaxDiff exercise, exploring why respondents made those choices to determine the depth at which the underlying need is experienced (Functional, Task, Emotional, Identity, or Ecosystem).

    Output — the Motivational Territory Map

    Need DomainFunctionalTaskEmotionalIdentityEcosystem
    Safety4.9%1.1%21.1%0.0%0.0%
    Caregiving6.4%12.5%1.8%1.3%0.0%
    Control4.0%9.4%1.3%1.3%0.0%
    Freedom7.7%3.5%2.5%0.3%0.0%
    Self-expression2.0%3.0%3.8%4.3%0.0%
    Shaded cell = the dominant Need Level for each domain.

    Viewed in order of demand, the map tells a clear story. Different Need Domains gravitate toward different Need Levels, and the largest pockets of demand are concentrated in a handful of cells.

    Safety @ Emotional (21.1%) — by far the largest single cell. Safety is experienced as reassurance, not as a feature.

    “I do some online transactions, and I’m always afraid of cyber attacks on my card. It would be nice to have peace of mind, and the card not linked at all to my bank account.”

    Caregiving @ Task (12.5%) — caregiving is expressed as a convenient way to provide for others.

    “I usually give gift cards to friends & family, so they can purchase whatever they want. It makes things easier for me, eliminates the cost of shipping & presents that don’t fit or the recipient would never use.”

    Control @ Task (9.4%) — control is about managing spending with less effort.

    “As a student I have a hard time with budgeting and often end up spending too much money. If I had a prepaid card I think it would help me better manage my finances.”

    Freedom @ Functional (7.7%) — freedom shows up as practical travel utility.

    “I think it’s very helpful to be able to load multiple currencies especially for traveling to different countries in a short period of time without the hassle of carrying a bunch of different currencies.”

    Self-expression @ Identity (4.3%) and Emotional (3.8%) — the only domain that reaches the identity level.

    “Gambling is my thing and I like keeping it on its own card, separate from my everyday life. It’s my own little world.”

    In short, several need-specific opportunities emerge — Safety @ Emotional, Caregiving @ Task, Control @ Task, Freedom @ Functional, and Self-expression @ Identity & Emotional. We can now compare this demand side with a supply-side reading of the Canadian market.

    Step 4 — Overlaying the Supply Side

    The previous step identified where customer demand is concentrated. The next step is to compare that demand landscape with the current supply of prepaid card offerings.

    How the supply side was assessed:  The supply side reflects a market-level analysis of the current Canadian prepaid card market. Each publicly marketed card was coded to its primary Motivational Territory (Domain @ Level) based on its publicly communicated value proposition. This is an assessment of brand positioning rather than consumer perception and is intended to illustrate the methodology rather than provide a definitive classification of the market.

    Based on this analysis, current market supply is concentrated in three of the five major demand territories:

    • Control @ Task and Functional (BMO Prepaid, EQ Bank Card, Neo Money, KOHO)
    • Freedom @ Functional (Wise, Cash Passport, Wealthsimple Cash)
    • Caregiving @ Task (Vanilla gift cards, Neo JA card)

    The Strategic Implication

    The two clearest demand–supply mismatches point to concrete opportunities.

    Safety @ Emotional is the single largest underserved cell. Very few brands have built their value proposition around emotional reassurance. Most emphasize security features such as encryption and fraud protection, but few position themselves around the emotional promise of “the card that lets you stop worrying online.”

    Self-expression @ Identity represents a genuine white-space opportunity. The underlying need already exists, but no dedicated prepaid card currently addresses it directly. Even the Joker Mastercard has expanded beyond its original focus on gambling and gaming. Instead, consumers satisfy this need indirectly through generic prepaid cards used for privacy rather than self-expression.

    Key takeaway:  Most prepaid cards look the same because they compete within the same Motivational Territories. The greatest opportunities emerge where customer demand exceeds competitive supply.

    This proof of concept demonstrates how Need Architecture helps organizations identify those opportunities. By combining MaxDiff with AI-guided interviews, it measures both what customers are trying to achieve and how deeply those motivations matter. Overlaying customer demand with current market supply reveals the Motivational Territories that remain underserved.

    In the Canadian prepaid card market, that analysis uncovered two opportunities: an emotionally positioned safety proposition and an identity-driven self-expression proposition.

    The same approach can be applied to virtually any category. Identify the Motivational Territories customers seek, compare them with the territories competitors occupy, and build products, pricing, and experiences around the greatest demand–supply mismatch.

    The Need Architecture Workflow

    Need Domain → MaxDiff → AI-Guided Interviews → Need Level → Motivational Territory → Demand–Supply Gap → Strategy

    The workflow above summarizes the Need Architecture process — from identifying customer motivations to translating them into actionable strategic decisions.

    Need Architecture Within the Demand Architecture Framework

    Need Architecture is the foundation of the five-module Demand Architecture framework:

    • Need Architecture — What motivates demand?
    • Persona Architecture — Who creates demand?
    • Product & Value Proposition Architecture — What should we build?
    • Pricing Architecture — How should we capture value?
    • Experience Architecture — How do we reinforce long-term customer commitment?

    Appendix — The Full List of Customer Need Domains

    Need DomainCore motivation — what the customer is ultimately pursuing
    ControlThe need to direct, manage, and have mastery over one’s environment and outcomes. “I want to be in charge of what happens.”
    FreedomThe need to be unencumbered, unrestricted, and autonomous. “I want fewer obligations and more choices.”
    SafetyThe need for safety, protection, and predictable stability. “I want to know I am protected against bad outcomes.”
    StatusThe need to be recognized as successful, capable, or elite by others. “I want others to see that I have succeeded.”
    SimplicityThe need to reduce complexity, cognitive load, and friction. “I want life to feel effortless and organized.”
    BelongingThe need to be part of a community of similar people. “I want to be with people who share my values.”
    AchievementThe need to accomplish, progress, and reach meaningful goals. “I want to keep getting better and hitting my targets.”
    CompetenceThe need to feel genuinely capable, skilled, and knowledgeable. “I want to know what I am doing and do it well.”
    Self-expressionThe need to communicate identity, values, and personality through choices. “I want my choices to reflect who I am.”
    ProgressThe need to be moving forward, developing, and continuously evolving. “I want to feel like I am always advancing.”
    StabilityThe need for consistency, predictability, and groundedness. “I want things I can count on, not constant change.”
    CaregivingThe need to protect, provide for, and support others. “I want to take care of the people who depend on me.”
    RecognitionThe need to be seen, appreciated, and acknowledged. “I want my contributions to be noticed and valued.”
    ExplorationThe need for novelty, discovery, and new experience. “I want to keep discovering things I have not encountered before.”
    Note: In this proof of concept the Security domain is expressed as “Safety” to match the category-specific language used with respondents.